The Trader Harbor
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks

The Trader Harbor

Politics

Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship blocked by another federal appeals judge in latest ruling

by admin July 26, 2025
July 26, 2025
Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship blocked by another federal appeals judge in latest ruling

A federal appeals judge on Friday blocked President Donald Trump’s plan to end birthright citizenship for the children of people in the country illegally or temporarily. 

U.S. District Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that a nationwide injunction on the Trump administration’s effort to end birthright citizenship that he issued earlier this year and that was granted to more than a dozen states can stand. 

Sorokin said the ruling was an exception to a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that limited lower courts’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions. The issue is expected to return to the Supreme Court.  

Trump and the administration ‘are entitled to pursue their interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment, and no doubt the Supreme Court will ultimately settle the question,’ Sorokin wrote in his ruling. ‘But in the meantime, for purposes of this lawsuit at this juncture, the Executive Order is unconstitutional.’

The Trump administration has argued that children born in the U.S. to parents in the country illegally and temporarily are not ‘subject to the jurisdiction’ of the United States and therefore not entitled to citizenship. 

Trump signed the birthright citizenship executive order, along with a slew of other orders, on his first day in office in January. 

On Wednesday, the San Francisco-based 9th Circuit Court of Appeals also affirmed the lower court’s nationwide injunction, and, earlier this month, a New Hampshire federal judge issued a ruling prohibiting Trump’s executive order from taking effect nationwide in a new class-action lawsuit.

Sorokin disagreed with the Trump administration’s argument that the Supreme Court’s ruling warranted a narrower ruling. 

The plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit argued that Trump’s executive order is unconstitutional because the 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship, and it also threatens millions of dollars in state funding for ‘essential’ health insurance services contingent on citizenship status. 

Reuters and the Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Europeans meet with Iranian officials face-to-face for first time since Israel, US bombings as sanctions loom
next post
Michelle Obama portraitist’s exhibit with trans Statue of Liberty pulled after pressure from Vance

Related Posts

Is the woke era over?

November 22, 2024

Trump announces picks for Army secretary, trade adviser,...

December 5, 2024

Trump slams mail-in ballots as corrupt, but may...

August 20, 2025

Kamala Harris’ new climate director said she is...

September 10, 2024

Former defense secretaries condemn Trump’s firing of senior...

February 28, 2025

Trump touts massive fundraising haul since winning 2024...

August 27, 2025

Pollster finds ‘astounding change’ in Democratic electorate since...

July 28, 2024

‘No dictators’: Top Democrat signals effort to restrain...

September 24, 2024

‘Vulnerable’ House lawmakers hold safety summit after Trump...

July 15, 2024

Trump says Biden had the ‘right to run,’...

August 9, 2024

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

      September 10, 2025
    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      September 10, 2025
    • Schumer-linked PAC accuses senator of stock ‘greed,’ but financial disclosure contradicts claim

      September 10, 2025
    • Jury pool shrinks as Ryan Routh trial unfolds in Florida on Day 2

      September 10, 2025
    • Dem crime policies crippling cities even in Red states as crackdown intensifies, White House warns

      September 10, 2025
    • Inside Epstein’s infamous ‘birthday book’: Clinton’s note, poolside candids and bizarre animal pics

      September 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,381)
    • Politics (4,446)
    • Stocks (1,639)
    • Uncategorized (45)
    • World News (1,374)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: TheTraderHarbor, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 thetraderharbor.com | All Rights Reserved