The Trader Harbor
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks

The Trader Harbor

Politics

Trump admin aims for killing blow to independence of ‘Deep State’ agencies

by admin February 17, 2025
February 17, 2025
Trump admin aims for killing blow to independence of ‘Deep State’ agencies

President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice is seeking to overturn a landmark Supreme Court case in an effort to give the president greater control over independent three-letter agencies.

In a move that could allow Trump to more easily fire officials who refuse to implement his policies, the acting U.S. solicitor general sent Illinois Democratic Sen. Dick Durbin a letter on Wednesday, notifying him of the Justice Department’s plans to ask the Supreme Court to overturn a key precedent that limits the president’s power to remove independent agency members. 

The letter, penned by Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris, says the DOJ has determined ‘that certain for-cause removal provisions’ that apply to certain administrative agency members are unconstitutional, and the department would ‘no longer defend their constitutionality.’

Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, the case in question, is a 1935 Supreme Court case that narrowed the president’s constitutional power to remove agents of the executive branch. 

Harris cited a previous case, Myers v. United States, which held that the Constitution granted the president sole power to remove executive branch officials. 

‘The exception recognized in Humphrey’s Executor thus does not fit the principal officers who head the regulatory commissions noted above,’ Harris wrote in the letter. 

‘To the extent that Humphrey’s Executor requires otherwise, the Department intends to urge the Supreme Court to overrule that decision, which prevents the President from adequately supervising principal officers in the Executive Branch who execute the laws on the President’s behalf, and which has already been severely eroded by recent Supreme Court decisions,’ Harris continued. 

Durbin called the letter a ‘striking reversal of the Justice Department’s longstanding position under Republican and Democratic presidents alike,’ in a statement to Fox News Digital. He added that the request is ‘not surprising from an administration that is only looking out for wealthy special interests – not the American people.’ 

However, conservative legal theorists supported the Trump administration’s move, arguing that overturning Humphrey’s Executor would move the federal government closer to the original intent of the Constitution’s framers. Trump notably posed his presidential campaign against former President Joe Biden as a contest between the ‘deep state’ and democracy, saying at the time, ‘Either we have a deep state or we have a democracy. We’re going to have one or the other. And we’re right at the tipping point.’

‘Congress makes the laws, it’s the president’s duty to carry out and enforce those laws under the unitary executive theory,’ Hans von Spakovsky, Senior Legal Fellow at the Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital. ‘That means that the president, since he’s the head of the executive branch, has complete control over the executive branch, and that includes the hiring and firing of everyone in the executive branch, most particularly, and most importantly, the heads of all the different offices and departments within the executive branch.’

Von Spakovsky says the exception carved out by the Court in Humphrey’s Executor ‘does not apply to these federal agencies.’ In her letter, Harris specifically mentioned the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). 

Earlier this month, a former NLRB member sued Trump over her termination, arguing that federal law protects her from being arbitrarily dismissed. The Trump administration has also become the target of various other lawsuits involving federal employee dismissals. 

‘My take on what’s going on with the Trump agenda right now is that they’re itching to get up to the higher federal court level, including the Supreme Court, to press just this kind of question,’ Ronald Pestritto, Graduate Dean and Professor of Politics at Hillsdale College, told Fox News Digital. 

Pestritto says some of the administration’s actions ‘contradict existing civil service law, existing protections, for example, against removing the NLRB commissioners.’

‘And so, clearly, they know they’re going to lose a lot of that at the lower court level. And they want to push them up into the Supreme Court, because they think they might get a reconsideration of it,’ Pestritto said. 

Von Spakovsky stated that independent agencies are ‘unaccountable’ as a result of Humphrey’s Executor, saying ‘you make them accountable to voters by putting them back where they belong, which is under the authority of the president.’

Trump’s lawyers are likely to lose in the lower court, Pestritto says, where he expects judges to apply the Supreme Court’s precedent in their own decisions. But even so, the Trump administration can appeal higher and higher to attempt to get Supreme Court review, where Humphrey’s Executor could be overturned. 

[Democrats] are going to win injunctions very often, first of all, because they know it’s easy to judge-shop for sympathetic district judges. And number two, the district judges are basically going to go by the existing Supreme Court precedent,’ Pestritto said. ‘And so the real tale of the tape will be when these initial rulings get appealed up the appellate ladder and ultimately up to the Supreme Court, which certainly has many justices who I think understand Article II of the Constitution properly and may be open to a reconsideration of Humphrey’s.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Protecting Americans’ data from China is central to an America First agenda
next post
Zelenskyy not yet signing US economic agreement ‘short-sighted,’ White House official says

Related Posts

GOP lawmaker leads letter condemning CCP’s ‘infiltration’ of...

March 9, 2024

Dr. Oz becomes next head of Medicare and...

April 4, 2025

JOE MANCHIN: The American people picked Trump. Now...

November 17, 2024

Trump hails cooperative effort at anti-revenge porn bill...

May 20, 2025

Jill Biden’s ex-husband calls her out for defending...

July 1, 2024

Trump picks Dr. Marty Makary as Food and...

November 23, 2024

Fox News invites Trump, Biden campaigns to vice...

May 18, 2024

Trump taps Sean Duffy to serve as interim...

July 10, 2025

Trump says Biden admin ‘knows what is happening’...

December 17, 2024

Harris unveils agenda to help Black men ‘get...

October 14, 2024

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Bed Bath & Beyond relaunches with first store in Nashville, plans dozens more

      August 10, 2025
    • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

      August 10, 2025
    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      August 10, 2025
    • Sydney Sweeney jeans controversy making advertising great again

      August 10, 2025
    • Nagasaki mayor issues chilling warning on 80th anniversary of atomic bombing

      August 10, 2025
    • Kash Patel celebrates major FBI achievements and record seizures during Trump’s first 200 days in office

      August 10, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,330)
    • Politics (4,206)
    • Stocks (1,577)
    • Uncategorized (45)
    • World News (1,323)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: TheTraderHarbor, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 thetraderharbor.com | All Rights Reserved