The Trader Harbor
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks

The Trader Harbor

Politics

Trump says it was ‘made clear’ that a president ‘has to have immunity,’ during ‘monumental’ SCOTUS arguments

by admin April 26, 2024
April 26, 2024
Trump says it was ‘made clear’ that a president ‘has to have immunity,’ during ‘monumental’ SCOTUS arguments

Former President Trump reacted to the ‘monumental’ hearing on presidential immunity at the Supreme Court Thursday, saying he thinks it was ‘made clear’ that a president ‘has to have immunity.’ 

The former president spoke to reporters after sitting in a Manhattan courtroom for hours Thursday—the seventh day of his criminal trial stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s investigation. 

Trump has pleaded not guilty to all 34 charges of falsifying business records in the first degree. 

While Trump sat in court listening to witness testimony, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments on the issue of presidential immunity, and whether he is immune from prosecution in a separate case—Special Counsel Jack Smith’s case related to 2020 election interference. 

Trump had requested to attend arguments in Washington D.C., but was rejected by New York Judge Juan Merchan, who has required the former president to be in court for each day of his criminal trial. 

‘I was forced to be here, and I’m glad I was, because it was a very interesting day in a certain way,’ Trump told reporters. 

‘The U.S. Supreme Court had a monumental hearing on immunity and the immunity having to do with presidential immunity,’ Trump said. ‘And I think it was made clear, I hope it is very clear that a president has to have immunity.’ 

Trump echoed his past argument that without immunity, the president would be reduced to just a ‘ceremonial’ position. 

‘That’s not what the founders had in mind,’ he said. ‘We want presidents that can get quite amazing—quite amazing.’ 

The former president said the Supreme Court justices ‘were on their game.’ 

‘So let’s see how that turns out,’ he said. ‘But again, I say presidential immunity is very powerful. Presidential immunity is imperative, or you practically won’t have a country anymore.’ 

The Supreme Court heard arguments from John Sauer, who delivered arguments on the matter on behalf of the former president and 2024 presumptive Republican presidential nominee. 

Michael Dreeben, a Justice Department prosecutor, delivered arguments on behalf of the government and Special Counsel Jack Smith. 

The high court is expected to rule on the matter by mid-June.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
New deep-water channel allows first ship to pass Key Bridge wreckage in Baltimore
next post
Trump attorney, Supreme Court justice clash on whether a president who ‘ordered’ a ‘coup’ could be prosecuted

Related Posts

Vance will likely be 2028 front-runner, but RNC...

December 17, 2024

Voice of America restored by judge after Trump...

April 23, 2025

Trump says US has given Iran proposal for...

May 16, 2025

Elon Musk sports black eye at farewell presser...

May 31, 2025

Marjorie Taylor Greene’s red line on Speaker Johnson

April 5, 2024

Speaker Johnson says it’s U.S.’s ‘biblical admonition’ to...

April 16, 2024

Gabbard launches ‘ODNI 2.0,’ with plan to cut...

August 21, 2025

‘Disturbing’: Whistleblower fumes at Biden-era agency promoting DEI...

February 7, 2025

White House unleashes on ‘rogue bureaucrats’ after agency...

March 9, 2025

Russia says Ukrainian drones hit nuclear power plant...

August 25, 2025

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Ben & Jerry’s co-founder resigns, claiming parent company Unilever ‘silenced’ its campaigning

      September 21, 2025
    • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

      September 21, 2025
    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      September 21, 2025
    • Trump caps UK trip with $350B tech pact, heads to Arizona for Kirk’s memorial service

      September 21, 2025
    • How AI browsers open the door to new scams

      September 21, 2025
    • WATCH: Defiant Kash Patel says he’s ‘proud’ to lead FBI after explosive hearing

      September 21, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,388)
    • Politics (4,539)
    • Stocks (1,661)
    • Uncategorized (45)
    • World News (1,381)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: TheTraderHarbor, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 thetraderharbor.com | All Rights Reserved