The Trader Harbor
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks

The Trader Harbor

Politics

SCOTUS sees ‘dangerous precedent’ in Trump immunity case if presidents can prosecute rivals: experts

by admin April 26, 2024
April 26, 2024
SCOTUS sees ‘dangerous precedent’ in Trump immunity case if presidents can prosecute rivals: experts

After a marathon debate over whether former President Trump should be granted presidential immunity for crimes alleged by Special Counsel Jack Smith, legal experts tell Fox News Digital that most of the Supreme Court justices appear concerned with how the ruling will impact the future functioning of the executive branch. 

In nearly three hours of debate on Thursday, the high court wrestled with this question: ‘Whether and if so to what extent does a former president enjoy presidential immunity from criminal prosecution for conduct alleged to involve official acts during his tenure in office?’

Legal experts told Fox News Digital that while it appeared the majority wasn’t sold on the idea of absolute immunity, they could determine that Trump, and any future former presidents, should be granted a qualified version of it.

‘I think the court recognizes that it would be a dangerous precedent if future presidents can prosecute their political rivals,’ Mark Brnovich, former attorney general of Arizona, told Fox News Digital.

‘They will set a limiting principle because, under the prosecutor’s theory, future prosecutors would have a lot of power to persecute their political rivals,’ Brnovich said. 

Over the course of questioning, the justices seemed generally split along ideological lines. 

‘If the potential for criminal liability is taken off the table, wouldn’t there be a significant risk that future presidents would be emboldened to commit crimes with abandon while they’re in office?’ Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asked in an exchange with Trump’s lawyer, John Sauer.

‘Once we say, ‘No criminal liability, Mr. President, you can do whatever you want,’ I’m worried that we would have a worse problem than the problem of the president feeling constrained to follow the law while he’s in office,’ Jackson said. 

Conversely, Justice Samuel Alito questioned whether limiting immunity for a former president would send the country into a destabilizing cycle.

‘If an incumbent who loses a very close, hotly contested election knows that a real possible after leaving office is not that the president is going to be able to go off into a peaceful retirement, but that the president may be criminally prosecuted by a bitter political opponent, will that not lead us into a cycle that destabilizes the functioning of our country as a democracy? And we can look around the world and find countries where we have seen this process, where the loser gets thrown in jail,’ Alito remarked. 

‘We’re writing a rule for the ages,’ Justice Neil Gorsuch later stated. 

John Shu, a constitutional scholar and former official in both Bush administrations, told Fox News Digital that the justices indicated ‘they believe this case isn’t really about Trump per se. It’s about the Office of the President, what future presidents can do, and whether they’ll be prosecuted for their choices.’

‘It’s a very important issue and the Biden administration set a very bad precedent to go after not only a former president, but one who also is challenging Biden’s re-election,’ he said.

‘What the Biden administration has done here gives the terrible appearance of vindictiveness, and on an international or foreign policy level, it makes us look like just another banana republic that we generally criticize for prosecuting or trying to jail their political opponents,’ he stated. 

Shu added that ‘many of the justices perhaps find what Trump did after the 2020 election distasteful.’ 

‘But they also seem uncomfortable with either granting blanket immunity on the one hand, or no immunity at all on the other. As often happens, the middle ground is where the discussions will be,’ he said. 

John Yoo, a law professor at University of California at Berkeley, said Trump’s argument ‘had much more success than many court watchers expected.’

‘Only the three liberal justices seemed to reject the idea of immunity outright. The six conservative justices recognized the need to prevent future presidents from criminalizing policy and constitutional differences with their predecessors,’ Yoo said. 

He added that a possible outcome could be that the justices punt the question back to the lower courts and ask them to first determine whether Trump’s actions amounted to ‘official’ or ‘private’ acts, before they decide whether immunity might extend to official acts.

A decision in the case is expected early this summer. 

The special counsel’s office declined to comment when reached by Fox News Digital.

Fox News’ Bill Mears and Shannon Bream contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
New deep-water channel allows first ship to pass Key Bridge wreckage in Baltimore
next post
Trump attorney, Supreme Court justice clash on whether a president who ‘ordered’ a ‘coup’ could be prosecuted

Related Posts

Biden says admin is ‘closer than we’ve ever...

August 17, 2024

Get to know Donald Trump’s Cabinet: Who has...

November 24, 2024

English courts consider nixing mandatory wigs for barristers...

May 20, 2024

US will ‘have to’ send weapons to Ukraine,...

July 8, 2025

Morning Glory: Defining competence down

August 1, 2024

Here’s what I’d like you all to remember...

April 15, 2024

Johnson demands NARA turn over records related to...

July 18, 2025

Hegseth orders ‘historic’ reduction of general officers in...

May 6, 2025

Biden set to address nation after pressured exit...

July 24, 2024

Greene calls for yanking FDA approval of COVID-19...

March 21, 2025

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Trump says it’s ‘highly unlikely’ he will fire Fed Chair after broaching idea with GOP reps

      July 18, 2025
    • Coca-Cola dodges after Trump says soda will switch back to cane sugar

      July 18, 2025
    • RGTI Stock Surged 30% — Is This the Start of a Quantum Comeback?

      July 18, 2025
    • Three Bearish Candle Patterns Every Investor Should Know

      July 18, 2025
    • These HOT Industry Groups are Fueling This Secular Bull Market

      July 18, 2025
    • Biden-era policy indirectly paying for unaccompanied minors’ abortions rescinded by Trump DOJ

      July 18, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,297)
    • Politics (4,021)
    • Stocks (1,528)
    • Uncategorized (45)
    • World News (1,290)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: TheTraderHarbor, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 thetraderharbor.com | All Rights Reserved