The Trader Harbor
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks
  • Business
  • Politics
  • World News
  • Stocks

The Trader Harbor

Politics

In abortion pill arguments, Supreme Court justices seem skeptical about FDA accountability experts say

by admin March 27, 2024
March 27, 2024
In abortion pill arguments, Supreme Court justices seem skeptical about FDA accountability experts say

The Supreme Court on Tuesday heard arguments challenging the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) relaxed regulations on a widely prescribed abortion pill, and while legal experts say that the case could be tossed due to a lack of standing, the justices appeared skeptical of the idea that the FDA could face no liability. 

Erin Hawley, senior counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, argued the case on behalf of a group of doctors challenging the FDA’s loose access restrictions on mifepristone. 

While the justices seemed skeptical that the doctors had standing to sue, they did seem to take issue with the lack of accountability for the FDA for any harms caused by the abortion pill.  

‘It’s quite troubling. It’s one thing to say no one has standing in a taxpayer case where it affects everyone. Here you have the FDA who’s not publicly accountable at all really, and has continually deregulated mifepristone. So I think that will be something the court really struggles with,’ Hawley said. 

Justice Samuel Alito at one point questioned Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar, arguing for the FDA. 

‘The statement was made that no court has ever previously second-guessed the FDA’s judgment about access to a drug,’ he said. ‘It’s never second-guessed that? Do you think the FDA is infallible?

‘So your argument is that it doesn’t matter if FDA flagrantly violated the law or didn’t do what it should have done, endanger the health of women,’ he said.

‘It’s just too bad, and nobody can sue in court?’ he pressed. 

Thomas Jipping, senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation, said that Alito’s questioning may have revealed his thinking on who has standing in such a matter. 

‘If you take a view of standing that results, not in these plaintiffs cannot sue, but no one can sue, maybe your view of standing is kind of misguided in the first place.,’ he said. ‘That was an interesting one.’

‘Sometimes justices ask questions, not only just for an answer on a specific legal question, but kind of they ask questions that are related to a train of thought, something that they’ve been considering,’ Jipping said. 

‘Maybe they’ve been talking about with their clerks sort of thinking out loud. And that was clearly one, that for Justice Alito and the Chief Justice. was the significant one,’ he added. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0
FacebookTwitterGoogle +Pinterest
previous post
Home price growth is back at pre-pandemic levels. Here’s what that means for buyers and sellers.
next post
Biden concedes to pro-Palestinian protesters after multiple interruptions: ‘They have a point’

Related Posts

Can Congress defund federal courts with key Trump...

March 25, 2025

McConnell endorses Trump for president after Super Tuesday...

March 7, 2024

Back from Alaska, Trump starts week with crucial...

August 18, 2025

Trump makes it official, announces North Dakota Gov....

November 16, 2024

‘F— the White women’: Black activists tied to...

August 2, 2024

Voters react to Gov Tim Walz dodging Tiananmen...

October 2, 2024

Trump nominees Collins, Stefanik to face senate grilling...

January 21, 2025

French right-wing leader Marine Le Pen found guilty...

March 31, 2025

Top Republican warns families of ‘largest tax hike...

April 16, 2025

Former defense secretary predicts Iran will strike at...

April 6, 2024

    Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Latest

    • Cracker Barrel rebrand: Why companies retreat when faced with consumer criticism

      August 30, 2025
    • Retail panic: What the end of the ‘de minimis’ exemption means for brands across the globe

      August 30, 2025
    • Spirit Airlines files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection for the second time in a year

      August 30, 2025
    • The Real Drivers of This Market: AI, Semis & Robotics

      August 30, 2025
    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      August 30, 2025
    • Meet the radical anti-Israel activists joining ‘Squad’ Dem Tlaib at Detroit confab

      August 30, 2025

    Categories

    • Business (1,370)
    • Politics (4,364)
    • Stocks (1,617)
    • Uncategorized (45)
    • World News (1,363)
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Disclaimer: TheTraderHarbor, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Copyright © 2025 thetraderharbor.com | All Rights Reserved